I don't want to get into too much trouble, but can we better define
exploitation of women?  Granted, Flynt was an asshole, and made a job of
it.  However, Hustler magazine and all of the others like it don't
really exploit women, do they?  The women do get paid as far as I know.  
People should explore sexuality however they feel most comfortable. 
Some men (and women) dig the two dimensional stuff.  If you want to talk
about objectification, talk about it.  But sexually explicit material
should be available to those who want it and are willing to pay whatever
price there may be.  If you want to change the image of women, boycott
beer and jeans and perfume, etc.  In those cases, sexuality is thrust
upon the viewer- He has no choice but see it.  You have to go buy a
Hustler.  You have to activelly select it.  
Larry Flynt was a fuckin jerk who happened to touch upon a lucrative
business plan.  That's all.
James I like my women in three dimensions Hepler